Photos from the Broadmoor

Broadmoor

Broadmoor

Rather than belaboring the details of how and why I ended up at the Broadmoor, suffice it to say that a few weeks ago I had the opportunity to spend a weekend at one of the most beautiful/pretentious hotels in the world. The Broadmoor is in Colorado Springs, tucked right at the foot of Cheyenne Mountain, so while I spent the weekend worrying about not tipping the wrong person, I did not have to worry about finding a good place to hide in the event of nuclear war.

Lily Pads Blue

Lily Pads Blue

Of course there are photo opportunities all over in Colorado Springs, but some of my favorite pictures from the weekend were taken just outside the carport of the Broadmoor, where they have a very nice fountain filled with lily pads and fish. The red lily pads are admittedly a little garish, like the sort of flower that might spew something potent enough to make Spock climb a tree, but I think they make a nice contrast with the blue ones.

Lily Pads Red

Lily Pads Red

New Stuff

Photokina, the world’s biggest photography equipment show is coming up, so there have been tons of announcements of new products in the lead-up to it…

  • Leica has finally announced the long-awaited M8 digital rangefinder. I really like the idea of a (relatively) small, quiet digital camera with interchangeable lenses, but unfortunately since it’s Leica the costs are sky-high. It looks like you could run up $10K pretty quickly for an M8 and a couple of lenses. No thanks.
  • In more down-to-earth news, Pentax has announced their new K10D, a 10MPix DSLR that looks to be roughly a match for my D200 except for the plastic body, but priced significantly lower. If I was buying into a camera system for the first time right now I’d be taking a long hard look at Pentax; the anti-shake built into their camera bodies coupled with their new digital oriented “pancake” prime lenses makes them look pretty appealing.
  • When people start asking me what lens they should buy, I’m going to start recommending this one.

Medium Format

Chris and I got together last Saturday to take some pictures. It was raining pretty vigorously off and on, so we ended up just walking over to the Botanical Gardens, which are right near my apartment but which I don’t visit nearly enough. Between the two of us we were carrying enough photo gear that the person at the desk asked if we were there to photograph whatever event they were holding there that evening.

I took the D200, of course, and the Panasonic, but Chris had the more interesting setup (at least in this digital day and age), a Mamiya 645AFD (or Mama-mia! as I thought when I first saw the thing) and a couple of Holgas along with his digital Olympus P&S.

Untitled

Untitled

We ended up pretty much switching cameras; Chris spent most of the time shooting with the D200, and I ran about a roll and a half through the Mamiya. I’m pretty much a child of digital as far as photography goes, so shooting medium format film was a pretty interesting experience for me. It’s a much slower, more cumbersome process, not that that’s necessarily a bad thing. The Mamiya is enormous; it makes the D200 look tiny by comparison, and the medium format lenses are out of necessity larger than their 35mm equivalents. The extra weight and bulk made me quite glad I’d taken the tripod along.

The Mamiya has autofocus, but to be honest, coming from the Nikon it kind of sucks. One AF point, and it tended to hunt around in the somewhat dim light in the gardens. It more than made up for it though with the fact that manually focussing was a treat compared to digital SLRs. The viewfinder is huge and bright, and it’s easy to see what you’re doing. It’s kind of like focussing on a 4×6 print instead of through a keyhole. Very nice.

The other thing that tends to slow you down with film (especially medium format) is that while on digital shots (and mistakes) are effectively free, you’re looking at a significant fraction of a dollar per frame with this much film. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing though. It encourages you choose your shots more carefully, and spend more time getting everything right the first time rather than checking the screen on the back and trying again if it’s wrong.

Untitled

Untitled

All in all, as far as the film-vs-digital debate goes, there are advantages and disadvantages to both. Chris liked the immediacy and ability to experiment that comes with the D200, and I liked the more methodical working method and thoughtfulness that the Mamiya encourages. Of course the real advantage to the medium format camera is that a 6×4.5 cm chunk of film can record a lot more detail than even the 10MPix sensor in the Nikon. The real disadvantage was obvious though when I had to wait until the middle of the week to see what I’d shot…

I’m definitely interested in adding some film gear to my arsenal though. If anybody’s got an old Nikon film body they’re looking to get rid of let me know. I’ll definitely be trawling through Ebay over the next few months.

As far as the Holgas go, that’s a whole different story for another time…

D80

So earlier this week Nikon announced what looks to be another killer camera, the D80. For the “I’ve misplaced the manual and I need to know what this button does” preview, DPReview’s got your back as usual. For a more concise overview of the new camera and functionality, I’d look at Rob Galbraith’s take. For some commentary on what the camera means and how it fits into the market, Thom Hogan and Mike Johnston both have some pretty insightful articles up.

I’m not sure what I can add that isn’t already covered pretty well by those articles. I’m not looking at buying one since my needs are pretty well covered right now, but for an enthusiast-level camera this one should cover 95% of most people’s needs, including my own. Looks like another winner for Nikon.

By the way, sorry for yet another month+ between posts. Like I’ve said in the past, when things get busy the website’s pretty much the first thing to go. I’m hoping to post some more stuff over the next few days, including some photos and reviews from Lollapalooza last weekend.

Lumix Linkage

I’ve found myself fascinated lately by the upcoming DSLR from Panasonic, the Lumix DMC-L1. I’ve run across a handful of pages related to this camera over the last couple weeks, and I thought I’d share them. DPReview have gotten their grubby mitts on one, and have a hands-on preview up. Panasonic have an interesting set of articles walking through the design process they went through for the camera. And there’s a screen grab of their lens lineup here. Looks like some interesting stuff in the pipeline.

I’m not sure why I’m so interested in this camera. I think part of it is that I really like my dinky Lumix point’n'shoot, and I’m interested to see what they can do with a DSLR. Part of it is that it looks to be a thoroughly modern camera in some ways (live view, ultrasonic dust filter, OIS) but they appear to have gone to great pains to make the handling and interface very… photographic, like an old manual film camera. Mostly though, I think it’s just because it’s so darn pretty.

D200

Amaryllis

D2oo: First Light

Above is literally the first shot out of my new D200. I figure since 200 is about 3x 70, this new camera should make me a 300% better photographer, right?

Just kidding, of course. But the D200 is definitely a nice step up from the D70. It’s not my intent to do a real “review” of the camera, partially because it’s not really my gig but also because others have already done a much better job than I could hope to. For the every-button-and-dial-explained review you can go to DPReview here, as usual; for a more concise review on what it’s actually like to use the camera I’d look here or here. I will point out some things I’ve noticed, though.

  • Of course the thing that jumps out on the spec sheet is the 10MPix sensor (as opposed to 6MPix on the D70). This isn’t as big of a win as you might think for me; at an 8×10 print size the difference would be unnoticeable. On the contrary, I’ve already noticed that the extra detail is showing up any deficiencies in my handling of the camera…
  • This thing is solid. In a cage match between the D70 and this camera, the D70 would be reduced to a shattered pile of plastic and the D200 would come out ready to shoot. Which is nice, since I don’t tend to be very kind to my cameras sometimes. Of course the flip side of that is that it’s noticeably bulkier and heavier than the D70 was. Win some, lose some.
  • The control layout is, I think, significantly more powerful than the D70, but it’s also more complex. I think it’s going to take some getting used to. I’m already beginning to see the advantages of having the AF-ON button separate from the shutter release.
  • The screen on the back is great. On the D70 I couldn’t really tell by the rear screen whether a shot was in good focus or not, so I ended up tossing out a fair number of shots when I got back to my computer. You can definitely tell on this screen. It’s really nice.
  • The viewfinder, which was one of my major reasons for upgrading, is kind of a mixed bag. From the reviews I was hoping it would be huge and bright like an old 35mm finder. It’s definitely larger, brighter, and sharper than the D70′s finder (which felt like peering through a keyhole sometimes), and it’s much easier to manually focus on this screen. But it’s still not nearly as large as even my dad’s old FG-20 finder. Chalk one up to overexpectations, I guess.

All in all, I really can’t see myself needing to upgrade again for a long time. Maybe if Nikon comes out with a (relatively) cheap full-frame DSLR, but I can’t see that happening for another 3-4 years at least. Which is perfectly fine by me. It’s kind of nice to step off the upgrade treadmill for a while.

Nikon to reduce film business

I suppose this was probably inevitable, sooner or later. Nikon has announced that they’re seriously curtailing their film-based camera business, cutting their film body production back to just the new F6 and the entry-level manual FG10, dropping all but a handful of their manual-focus lenses, and stopping production of things like their large format lenses. Of course there are still tons of usable Nikon film bodies and lenses out on the used market for those who want them, but film seems to be moving higher up the endangered species list every day.

Lightroom

Yesterday, Adobe announced Lightroom, a “professional photographic workflow tool” similar to Apple’s Aperture. It won’t be released for some time, I think, but they released a Mac-only beta when they announced it yesterday. Far more experienced and qualified photographers than myself have weighed in on it, but I thought I’d give my impressions from playing around with the beta.

  • This is definitely a beta, nowhere near release quality software. Not only in the sense that it has bugs, but that it’s missing tools (you can’t even crop with it). I’ve actually encountered surprisingly few serious bugs, but I haven’t used it that heavily yet (I only have a hundred or so images imported).
  • Something I haven’t seen mentioned elsewhere: This thing really doesn’t like Unsanity’s Application Enhancers. I have ShapeShifter installed on my machine since I’m not a fan of Aqua, and Lightroom was very sluggish in use at first. After adding it to the Master Exclude List in the APE control panel performance jumped up several notches to “tolerable”. (Dual processor 1.8GHz G5 for reference)
  • Lightroom doesn’t seem to have the user interface flash that Aperture does. That may come closer to release though. The interface layout seems to be logical and clean, and more streamlined than something like ACR.
  • The Grayscale Mixer seems like it will end up being very useful for getting good B&W pictures. I think I like it
  • The organization tools seem a bit rudimentary compared to some other apps I’ve used, but I’m quite willing to admit that I just haven’t tried it that extensively.
  • I see a couple of major advantages over Aperture right off the bat (at least on paper). First, Lightroom allows you to import your images into its database while leaving the actual files where they’re at on disk; Aperture insists you suck all of the files into its relatively opaque database file. Second, Adobe has said Lightroom will have an extensive plugin architecture by v1.0, which is something that’s helped turn Photoshop into the 800lb. gorilla it is.

It’s definitely good to see some competition in this arena; existing solutions like Photoshop are powerful, but almost too powerful and not streamlined enough for general use. Having several companies will result in better software for less. I’d recommend if you have a Mac and a digital camera (especially one that shoots RAW) to check out the beta.